European Constitutionalism and the Charter
Files
Description
The aim of this chapter is to situate the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the context of the much broader, less easily captured and often slippery notion of European constitutionalism. The present time is, by any standards, an exciting period in European constitutional development. A particular confluence of events has triggered a high-level and sustained degree of political debate about the constitutional future of the EU, beginning with contributions and speeches from virtually all of Europe's political leaders in 2000 and 2001, and continuing with the Convention and the Forum on the future of Europe in 2002-2003, leading up to the 2004 Intergovernmental Conference (IGC). Further, the 'second phase' of the process regarding the legal nature and effects of the Charter is well underway. The first phase, in accordance with the decision of Cologne European Council meeting in 2000, was solemnly to 'proclaim' the Charter, and this was done in Nice in December 2000 by the Parliament, the Commission and the Council. The second step was then to 'consider whether and if so how an integration of the Charter into the treaties could take place', and the 'Convention on the Future of Europe' which was subsequently established with a mandate to prepare for the 2004 IGC was given a central role within this constitutional process. The third phase is apparently to be the ultimate decision of the IGC itself as to the role and effect of the Charter. However, certain recent EU policy initiatives place the debate on constitutionalism and the Charter in a starker and more concrete context, and raise a number of troubling questions. To take a vivid example, the speedy adoption of a European arrest warrant has been one of the internal EU responses to the attacks of 11 September 2001. In the Preamble to the framework decision on the arrest warrant, the Union's respect for fundamental rights, in particular those mentioned in Chapter VI of the Charter of Fundamental Rights relating to 'justice', is proclaimed. Two preliminary comments should be made in this context. The first is that mere reference to fundamental rights and to the Charter does not alter the fact that the European arrest warrant in practice undermines such rights, as indeed has been argued by a number of NGOs and by dissenting voices within the European Parliamentary debate. Secondly, a recent commentator has posed the pertinent question whether 'any sort of debate about constitutions, constitutionalism and constitutionalisation' including the work of the high-profile Convention 'can assist in resolving the very real political problems faced by the EU at the present time', problems which include the economic challenges of globalisation, reform of the institutions, and the impending enlargement of the EU. In order to relate the emergence of the Charter to the development of European constitutionalism, we begin by outlining the political context and background to the current constitutional debate. Secondly, various understandings of European constitutionalism are discussed, and finally, the place and role occupied by the Charter within this picture of European constitutional development is appraised.
Source Publication
The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights
Source Editors/Authors
Steve Peers, Angela Ward
Publication Date
2004
Recommended Citation
de Búrca, Gráinne and Aschenbrenner, Jo Beatrix, "European Constitutionalism and the Charter" (2004). Faculty Chapters. 326.
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-chapt/326
