Commentary, Alternate Modes of Reproduction: The Locus and Determinants of Choice
Files
Description
Long before the Baby M case ignited passions and made debate about surrogacy a national pastime, the participants in the Project on Reproductive Laws for the 1990s saw the need to consider the profoundly difficult questions surrounding legal regulation of new reproductive technologies. Their position papers are reflective of broad concerns, rather than reactive to an immediate controversy. They enable us both to learn from individual cases, like the case of Baby M, and to put the lessons of those cases in a larger context. The Andrews paper, which serves to focus and inform our discussion of reproduction involving third parties, is no exception. It is enriched by a broad perspective, a wealth of information, and the judgment of a woman who has given careful and sustained consideration to the intricate set of policy concerns that surround official regulation of sexual and family matters.
Source Publication
Reproductive Laws for the 1990s
Source Editors/Authors
Sherrill Cohen, Nadine Taub
Publication Date
1989
Recommended Citation
Davis, Peggy C., "Commentary, Alternate Modes of Reproduction: The Locus and Determinants of Choice" (1989). Faculty Chapters. 310.
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-chapt/310
