International Responsibility for Global Environmental Harm: Collective and Individual
Files
Description
There are important doctrinal and institutional obstacles in the way of proper treatment of collective legal responsibility of several States for global environmental harm, but no serious theoretical obstacles. Difficult theoretical issues do arise at the level of justification, however. The chapter investigates how legal and moral responsibility of individuals, States, and collectives of both all fit together as a normative matter, using global environmental harm as its case study. It argues that shared moral responsibility—the responsibility an individual has when acting together with others—is a very important moral phenomenon. By contrast we have no need for the idea of a collective (such as a State) itself being morally responsible. Ideally, the shared ex ante moral responsibilities of individuals together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would be discharged by domestic law under the guidance of international law. Where non-complying States face sanctions, the burden of those sanctions will be imposed on individuals who are not responsible for their State’s failure. Yet citizens have political obligations to improve their States, including in the matter of compliance with international law. If the sanctions can be seen as doing citizens’ work for them, the burdens imposed do not seem objectionable.
Source Publication
Theories of International Responsibility Law
Source Editors/Authors
Samantha Besson
Publication Date
2022
Recommended Citation
Murphy, Liam B., "International Responsibility for Global Environmental Harm: Collective and Individual" (2022). Faculty Chapters. 1975.
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-chapt/1975
