Justifying Targeted Killing with a Neutral Principle?
Files
Description
This chapter examines a proposed legal norm that would license targeted killing: N1: Named civilians may be targeted with deadly force if they are presently involved in planning terrorist atrocities or are likely to be involved in carrying them out in the future. It explores not only the issue of likely abuses of norms like N1 but also the way in which those abuses disclose inherent difficulties with the norm. The last part of the chapter (Sections VIII to X) makes the case that the liability to abuse of norms like N1 is not just an instance of the general liability of any legal norm to abuse. It is connected also with its content, for N1 represents a relaxation of one of the most important norms we have—the norm against murder—and the justifications adduced for N1 or for similar principles represent a significant modification of our usual way of arguing about murder—a modification in the direction of moral opportunism and unreliable analogy.
Source Publication
Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World
Source Editors/Authors
Claire Finkelstein, Jens David Ohlin, Andrew Altman
Publication Date
2012
Recommended Citation
Waldron, Jeremy, "Justifying Targeted Killing with a Neutral Principle?" (2012). Faculty Chapters. 1574.
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-chapt/1574
