WTO Dispute Resolution and the Preservation of the Public Domain of Science under International Law
Files
Description
The TRIPS Agreement can be read to reflect a static view of the structure of intellectual property law. In this chapter, we address whether—and how—the TRIPS Agreement can be interpreted to give it more fluidity, and thus to allow adjustments in national intellectual property regimes designed to reflect the dynamic nature of information production. To focus that inquiry, we concentrate on efforts to ensure a broader public domain for “upstream” inventions by modifying various elements of U.S. patent law. The paper considers three stylized examples and asks whether each approach could be adopted by the United States without falling afoul of the TRIPS Agreement, as it is currently understood. Our purpose is to identify interpretive approaches that allow Members to keep their laws attuned to the developments and needs of science. In so doing, we also raise broader questions regarding the level of formalism generated by the WTO dispute settlement system, and the extent to which the TRIPS Agreement allocates power between supranational and national institutions, and between international and national laws.
Source Publication
International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime
Source Editors/Authors
Keith E. Maskus, Jerome H. Reichman
Publication Date
2010
Recommended Citation
Dinwoodie, Graeme B. and Dreyfuss, Rochelle C., "WTO Dispute Resolution and the Preservation of the Public Domain of Science under International Law" (2010). Faculty Chapters. 1194.
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-chapt/1194
