Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Houston Law Review
Abstract
This paper proceeds in four additional parts. Part II provides a brief overview of the central arguments introduced in Retaking Rationality. Part III argues that cost-benefit analysis has been heartily embraced by the Obama Administration, indicating that, whatever one thinks of it, cost-benefit analysis is even more likely here to stay than when Retaking Rationality was published. Part IV discusses the relationship of protection-oriented interest groups to cost-benefit analysis over the last two years: what has changed; what has stayed the same since the publication of Retaking Rationality. Part V provides a brief reply to comments offered by Professors Douglas Kysar and Alexander Volokh in this volume.
First Page
1
Volume
48
Publication Date
2011
Recommended Citation
Michael A. Livermore & Richard L. Revesz,
Retaking Rationality Two Years Later,
48
Houston Law Review
1
(2011).
Available at:
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-articles/944
