Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Columbia Law Review
Abstract
Since it was decided in 2003, Lawrence v. Texas has underwritten the effort to expand access to marriage to same-sex couples. It is curious that Lawrence has served as a foundation for same-sex marriage. After all, Lawrence was not a case about marriage—samesex or otherwise. Instead, Lawrence was a case about criminal sex and more specifically about limiting the state’s authority to regulate and punish nonmarital sex and sexuality. In short, Lawrence was a case about sexual liberty. The focus on Lawrence as a way station to samesex marriage has allowed us to overlook a developing threat to Lawrence’s values of sexual liberty and limits on the state’s authority to regulate and punish nonmarital sex. As this Essay explains, in the twelve years since Lawrence was decided, an alternative system of sexual regulation has become more visible. Meaningfully, this alternative system is distinct from both the criminal sexual regulation that preceded Lawrence and the marital sexual regulation that has flourished in Lawrence’s wake. But while it exists outside of both criminal law or marriage law—the two domains that, historically, have served as the principal sites of state sexual regulation—this alternative system of civil regulation nonetheless incorporates the values of both of these regulatory domains by condemning and punishing sex outside of marriage. And perhaps most troublingly, this civil system of sexual regulation resists the constitutional protections for nonmarital sex that Lawrence conferred. This Essay surfaces and explores this emergent form of civil sexual regulation that, until now, has been neglected and overlooked. As it explains, this alternative system of civil sexual regulation achieves many of the same punitive ends that criminal sexual regulation accomplished before Lawrence and in so doing repudiates Lawrence’s core values. In this way, this system of civil regulation poses a threat to the prospect of greater liberty in intimate life.
First Page
573
Volume
116
Publication Date
2016
Recommended Citation
Melissa Murray,
Rights and Regulation: The Evolution of Sexual Regulation,
116
Columbia Law Review
573
(2016).
Available at:
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-articles/840
