Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Michigan Law Review
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explain why the Court's muchmaligned decision in Hicks was correct, and to further argue that in the aftermath of Hicks, the McDonnell Douglas-Burdine proof structure ought to be abandoned.
First Page
2229
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2307/1289935
Volume
93
Publication Date
1995
Recommended Citation
Malamud, Deborah, "The Last Minuet: Disparate Treatment After Hicks" (1995). Faculty Articles. 751.
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-articles/751
COinS
