Document Type

Article

Publication Title

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

Abstract

Challenges the common thinking about the use of history in constitutional interpretation. Replacement of the apparent choice between anachronistic originalism or non-historical living constitutionalism; Alteration in the constitutional values passed from generation to generation; Interpretive methodology to resolve the tension between originalism and living constitutionalism.

First Page

1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.2307/3312757

Volume

147

Publication Date

1998

Download

Share

COinS