Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Notre Dame Law Review
Abstract
Our conclusions may be summarized simply: Feldman itself should be overruled. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine should be abolished. Doubt should be cast on state supreme court management of the essentially regulatory function of licensing attorneys and disciplining attorneys and judges. Finally, there might be a need for a new doctrine to plug the small hole left by the Younger and preclusion doctrines - in other words, to bar state plaintiffs from jumping ship to federal court in midstream if they become dissatisfied with state court proceedings.
First Page
1129
Volume
74
Publication Date
1999
Recommended Citation
Friedman, Barry and Gaylord, James E., "Rooker-Feldman, From the Ground Up" (1999). Faculty Articles. 430.
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-articles/430
