Document Type
Article
Publication Title
University of Chicago Legal Forum
Abstract
Currently, most telecommunications mergers require approval of both the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") and the Department of Justice ("DOJ"). Although the agencies' respective statutory mandates differ-the FCC reviews mergers under the Communications Act's broad "public interest" standard and DOJ follows the competition-based standard of the federal antitrust laws-the agencies themselves both claim to focus their review on what they believe to be the merger's effect on competition. That is, the FCC sees its role as that of a shadow DOJ, analyzing mergers under the public interest standard to deter- mine how they will influence competition in the telecommunications industry. Despite this claimed overlap, their approaches- and, consequently, frequently their outcomes-are markedly different.
First Page
29
Volume
2000
Publication Date
2000
Recommended Citation
Rachel E. Barkow & Peter W. Huber,
A Tale of Two Agencies: A Comparative Analysis of FCC and DOJ Review of Telecommunications Mergers,
2000
University of Chicago Legal Forum
29
(2000).
Available at:
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/fac-articles/1314
