Description
Rather than attempt still another doctrinal discourse, this chapter approaches the law of search and seizure from a different angle. After a brief description of the major constitutional guarantees that defense counsel may invoke to challenge the legality of police searches and seizures and thereby the admissibility of prosecution evidence produced by those activities (§ 25.2 infra), the text sets out a checklist of questions that counsel can ask and answer (with minimal investigation) about the facts of any particular case s/he is handling (§ 25.3 infra). The references following each question will direct counsel to subsequent sections containing functional analyses of the law applicable to the basic factual situation targeted by the question. These analyses should assist counsel in identifying particular aspects of law enforcement activity that may be assailable in each situation, together with the theoretical grounds and supporting authorities for assailing them.
First Page
831
Source Publication
Trial Manual 11 for the Defense of Criminal Cases
Source Editors/Authors
Anthony G. Amsterdam, Randy A. Hertz
Publication Date
2026
Document Type
Chapter
Edition
11
Rights & Restrictions
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Recommended Citation
Anthony G. Amsterdam & Randy A. Hertz,
Chapter 25 - Motions To Suppress Tangible Evidence,
Trial Manual 11 for the Defense of Criminal Cases
831
(2026).
Available at:
https://gretchen.law.nyu.edu/tmdcc/31
